+91 99717 59700contact@parenspatrice.com

About

A chambers trained under former judges and senior advocates

Quality rather than quantity — original research, ethical independence, and advocacy from trial court to the Supreme Court.

People come to us at a difficult hour. We meet that hour with light — a clear view of the law, a calm map of the forum, and a path that can end in a just settlement or a well-fought hearing.

Conflict drains families, companies and public institutions alike. The chambers exists to restore orientation: what the statute requires, what the record will support, what a tribunal is likely to ask, and how a lawful peace — if available — can be reached without surrendering rights that must be preserved.

Parens Patrice was established by a group of lawyers who received first-hand training from former judges and senior advocates of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Delhi. It is a full-service law firm with specialised strength in arbitration, commercial, civil, and criminal laws — and a working conviction that quality of counsel must never be sacrificed to volume of briefs.

The firm’s lawyers have served as Central Government Senior Counsel, have been on the panel of several companies, the Ministry of Defence and PSUs, have been guest faculties in law colleges, have judged moot courts in various universities, and have authored articles and critical comments on important court judgments published by research and corporate journals of national repute. These strands — public briefing, teaching, and writing — keep the chambers honest about the law as it is actually applied, not as it is advertised.

The firm has rendered legal opinions on diverse fields of law such as mines and minerals, intellectual property rights, international and domestic arbitrations, corporate commercial laws, indirect taxes, corporate criminal liabilities, property, the Stamp & Registration Act, and the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code. Opinions are treated as instruments of decision-making: they state the risk, the counter-argument, and the recommended path with equal clarity.

In the changing legal and business environment, Parens Patrice is committed to achieving the highest degree of excellence and therefore lays great emphasis on original and extensive legal research and creative thinking in each case. Whether the matter is a construction arbitration for a defence establishment, a commercial recovery before a trial court, or a matrimonial dispute that can still be settled with dignity, the chambers approaches the brief as if the next hearing may decide the course of years.

Today the practice operates from Lajpat Nagar with a court chamber at Tis Hazari, assisted by a team of advocates and paralegal staff. Instruction is accepted across a coordinated set of forums — from District Courts in Delhi and the NCR to the Delhi High Court, the Supreme Court of India, NCDRC, NCLT/NCLAT, DRT/DRAT, and arbitral tribunals — so that a client is not forced to retell the story at every gate.

From the first conference, the chambers seeks to give the instructing party a map: which forum has jurisdiction, what the record already shows, where the pressure points of evidence lie, and whether the wiser course is interim relief, a full trial, an arbitral reference, an appeal, or a structured settlement. That map is written in plain language, then tested against statutes and precedent before a single pleading is filed.

Partners of the firm have served as Central Government Senior Counsel, sit on panels of ministries, PSUs and statutory bodies, teach and adjudicate at law schools, and publish critical commentary on important judgments. The same discipline that shapes a Supreme Court brief is brought to a District Court recovery suit or a family mediation — because the client’s peace of mind depends on coherence, not on the grandeur of the forum alone.

Clear thinking. Golden craft.

Chambers work here is measured by the quality of the brief, the honesty of the advice, and the dignity of the forum. Partners prepare as if every matter may travel from a trial court to the Supreme Court — because many do. Original research, ethical independence, and a preference for settlement where settlement serves justice are the daily habits of the practice.

The culture is deliberately unhurried at the stage of comprehension and deliberately firm at the stage of advocacy. Conferences are used to listen; research is used to decide; pleadings are used to frame; and hearings are used to persuade. Technology — including continuing education in emerging legal tools — is treated as a servant of craft, never as a substitute for judgement.

  • Supreme Court & High Court presence, including Union of India panel experience
  • Domestic and international commercial arbitration — construction and infrastructure depth
  • Government and PSU empanelments: NHIDCL, BIS, DG MAP, MMTC, NCERT, NIXI
  • Full-forum coverage from District Courts to the Supreme Court, NCDRC, NCLT and DRT
  • Mediation-aware advocacy where early resolution serves the client
  • Research culture: publications, moot adjudication, guest lectures, ADR diplomas

Judgement before volume

We decline the factory model of litigation. Each matter receives original research, a clear procedural map, and advocacy that can stand before the highest court. A short list of well-prepared briefs is preferred to a crowded diary of half-understood files.

Forum-true strategy

Trial craft, High Court writs, Supreme Court appellate work, and arbitration are coordinated — so the client is not briefed in fragments. The same facts are not told differently to different forums; strategy travels with the record.

Settlement with backbone

Mediation is not a retreat from the law. Where a durable peace is possible, we pursue it from the first conference; where it is not, we contest with discipline. Partners known for cross-examination and courtroom stamina are equally prepared to persuade parties toward resolution when years of delay have already exacted their cost.

Morning scholarship

Contribution to the administration of justice

A chambers earns its place not only by the matters it wins, but by the standards it leaves behind — in classrooms, in published commentary, and in the quiet work of helping parties leave conflict with a lawful peace. Contribution to society, for us, begins with accurate counsel and continues in the education of younger lawyers and the clarification of difficult questions of law.

Legal education & moots

Partners have judged university moot court competitions — including the quarter-final of the 3rd Amity International Moot Court Competition (2013), the 4th NHRC–LC-1 National Moot Court Competition (2016), and the XIV LC-1 All Delhi Moot Court Competition (2018) — mentoring aspiring advocates in oral craft, memorial discipline and professional ethics. Guest lectures on intellectual property, arbitration and the Negotiable Instruments Act have been delivered to law students and Company Secretaries.

Scholarship that tests the law

Eight critical articles on arbitration, consumer protection, privacy, medical negligence, capital punishment and related themes have been published in magazines and research journals of national repute. The chambers assisted an Associate Professor of Campus Law Centre, University of Delhi, in writing Copyright and Related Rights – National & International Perspectives (Macmillan India Ltd.). Writing is treated as a public responsibility: to test the reasoning of judgments and to leave a clearer trail for those who come after.

Mediation as public good

Partners treat early, fair settlement as a contribution to court congestion and to families and businesses exhausted by delay — especially in long-pending civil, commercial, and matrimonial disputes. A mediation that restores peace without erasing rights is, in the chambers’ view, as much a service to the administration of justice as a hard-fought decree.

Public institutions

Panel and consultancy work for ministries, PSUs and statutory bodies — including defence housing arbitrations for DG MAP, highways (NHIDCL), standards (BIS), trade (MMTC), education (NCERT) and internet governance (NIXI) — is undertaken as a duty of accurate, independent counsel to the Republic’s institutions. The opposite parties in those matters have included major EPC contractors; the firm’s duty has been to the public interest entrusted to it.

Forums of appearance

Instruction is accepted with an eye to the correct forum — and to the appellate or arbitral path that may follow.

  • Supreme Court of India
  • High Court of Delhi
  • District Courts, Delhi & NCR
  • NCDRC
  • NCLT / NCLAT
  • DRT / DRAT
  • Arbitral tribunals — ICA, DIAC & ad hoc