+91 99717 59700contact@parenspatrice.com

Insight

Beg to Differ — The Judgement of the Supreme Court in Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank

January 2005 · Praveen Kumar Jain

Under the Consumer Protection Act, the opposite party is under a statutory duty to file its reply within prescribed time. The article examines the Supreme Court’s approach to the 45-day outer limit and the forum’s duty thereafter to proceed on the complainant’s evidence.

This page summarises published commentary for informational purposes. It is not a legal opinion. Original publication copies will be re-hosted with the author’s permission.