Insight

Beg to Differ — The Judgement of the Supreme Court in Topline Shoes Ltd. v. Corporation Bank

January 2005 · Praveen Kumar Jain

Under the Consumer Protection Act, the opposite party is under a statutory duty to file its reply within prescribed time. The article examines the Supreme Court’s approach to the 45-day outer limit and the forum’s duty thereafter to proceed on the complainant’s evidence.

This page summarises published commentary for informational purposes. It is not a legal opinion. Original publication copies will be re-hosted with the author’s permission.

Get In Touch

Are you looking for someone to help?

Write or telephone when you wish to explore whether the chambers can assist. Please share only non-confidential particulars at first contact. An enquiry, email or form submission does not create an attorney–client relationship; engagement begins only after a conference and a clear understanding of conflict, scope and terms.

Office

D-143, LGF, Lajpat Nagar-I

New Delhi – 110024

Court Chamber

Chamber No. 469-A, Western Wing

Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi – 110054

Send an enquiry

Share only non-confidential particulars. We will reply by email or telephone.